RAGE pt II

[puddingcat]

That berk from The Times Online has done it again. At lest this time it's obvious he's trolling for comments. I wish he'd addressed the cost issue, though. £500 a month? I still can't believe it. And *still* I hate myself for agreeing with him about the bottom line.

In a wonderful segue, I Have Baked! Well, I've actually made Invergarry Special - rice crispies bound with melted butter, hard toffee and marshmallows, covered with chocolate :)

Yuletide is shaping up. Last minute? Oh yes. I'm very happy that only 280-ish people have uploaded so far :)

Comments

[munchkinott.livejournal.com]

It's nothing to do with looks, beauty maintenance etc. He's suffering from a bad case of Aesop's Fox & The Grapevine.

American girls are the pinnacle of all goodness because they're legally sexually unapproachable and tee-total until 18 & 21 respectively. And they're all slim, waiflike, delicate flowers from a nation that isn't the top of the WHO's obesity table - because they wouldn't know HOW to open a chocolate bar. American girls are pure and totally NOT lesbians, because you can't use that argument anymore when a woman turns you down.

Which means he's stuck with the sour, nasty, shrivelled and frumpy British girls. Most of whom spent the time between the ages of 16 and 18 getting so fucked and drunk that by the time 21 comes around they're wily, self-assured and wise. Basically, the only tool left in the Lonely Man arsenal is to attack from a position of post-feminist nu-chauvanist masculinity, and apply the various constructs within the female marketing model to create insecurities, lower self-esteem and introduce a self-perpetuating doubt in women's heads. It won't get him laid, but what it does is make him feel better than the men who ARE getting laid, now have to put up with 10x the amount of insecure 'I'm [insert visual issue] do you still love me?' dribbling they usually do.

I think his perfect partner is either a like-minded man or will be arriving with a complimentary footpump.