OH THE RAGE
Dec. 11th, 2007 09:35 amVia
faerierhona, a link from The Times Online.
Ok, there's a related article with a different point of view as well, but still THE RAGE. IT BURNS.
(Worst of all, I suspect it burns most because I have a deep-rooted belief that he's telling the truth. I dislike my RAGE being directed at myself.)
Ok, there's a related article with a different point of view as well, but still THE RAGE. IT BURNS.
(Worst of all, I suspect it burns most because I have a deep-rooted belief that he's telling the truth. I dislike my RAGE being directed at myself.)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 08:15 pm (UTC)And I quote: but at least I’d put on a clean shirt, shaved and brushed my teeth.
When men are prepared to put £1,000 a month into THEIR appearances, then they can talk. But a clean shirt, shaving (I bet he stopped at his face) and brushed teeth (no floss, no mouthwash - I bet he was out and done in 5 secs) and EXPECTING TO WIN HIMSELF A SUPERMODEL?? AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! X-D X-D
I can't get angry at that. I really can't. Being pissed off at the mentally ill is discrimination now, isn't it? What he scored was a nice, normal girl and he's projecting his failure onto her via the medium of a checklist he pulled out the back of an old issue of Cosmo. To make matters worse I spy with my little eye the socially acceptable side of paedophilia - English girls? Get 'em young n' fresh n' within 20 minutes of being legal.
American girls? Ah, well, there you have to wait until they're at least 18; 21 if you want to wine n' dine 'em. So of course, they're better and have had time to cultivate and craft their
virginal floraappearances.THAT I can get mad at. THAT right there *points up* SEE ME RAGE!