![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
puddingcat< 12yr old boy humour >
So, when I had my mention in the Telegraph motoring section, it was under the title "In, Out, In, Out, Shake It All About".
This time, I'm titled "Science not sex".
I need to get out more.
(Although I have to say, why can't they realise that science *is* sexy?)
So, when I had my mention in the Telegraph motoring section, it was under the title "In, Out, In, Out, Shake It All About".
This time, I'm titled "Science not sex".
I need to get out more.
(Although I have to say, why can't they realise that science *is* sexy?)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-03-31 03:34 pm (UTC)If you look at stats, and population biology and behavioural ecology, and PHYSICS, you'll see that all the maths and the equations do is describe what is going on in front of you in a way that the human brain can understand. What is a log graph but Data Manipulation? What is relativity but equations and statistics? Eh? EH? is my data not hard enough for you? Eh? Just because physics and maths are old sciences, and have gone beyond the descriptive and experimental stage into the theoretical doesn't mean that the younger sciences aren't valid, or are lesser sciences . (Smirks about HARD science < /12 year old brain >)