puddingcat (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
puddingcat) wrote2007-05-15 09:08 pm
puddingcat) wrote2007-05-15 09:08 pm
Entry tags:
Looking good naked is easy if you already do.
Hmm.
How To Look Good Naked is a lovely idea, and I really like Gok Wan. The thing is (which I can't write / read without thinking of Aziraphale...), all the people so far look good anyway. Sure, they need a haircut and professional makeup, and the clothes make a difference, but they're all attractive at the start.
What about people with scars? With eczema? Who aren't in proportion? Who are more than a stone overweight?
Bah.
How To Look Good Naked is a lovely idea, and I really like Gok Wan. The thing is (which I can't write / read without thinking of Aziraphale...), all the people so far look good anyway. Sure, they need a haircut and professional makeup, and the clothes make a difference, but they're all attractive at the start.
What about people with scars? With eczema? Who aren't in proportion? Who are more than a stone overweight?
Bah.
no subject
Hrm. I'm not sure I agree.
Definitely with you on the underwear thing, though; it's one of the bits "Auntie Gok" makes a real, positive difference with :)
I wish it was as simple as (New Undies)+(Haircut)+(Makeup)=(Looking Good).
no subject
I can't think of anything that I would find actively bad on a naked person, short of open wounds and obvious hernias. I think you lot have a different definition of good to me. There are plenty of things I find not attractive on naked people (penises for example), but there is not a requirement on everybody I see to be sexually attractive to me.