puddingcat: (Creative killing)
puddingcat ([personal profile] puddingcat) wrote2006-10-01 05:32 pm
Entry tags:

[identity profile] suzerain.livejournal.com 2006-10-01 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
it has to be a pisstake....

really. they can't be serious?

*twitch*

[identity profile] puddingcat.livejournal.com 2006-10-01 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I hope it's a pisstake, but [livejournal.com profile] westernind didn't think so, and I respect her Knowledge of Many Things.

[identity profile] suzerain.livejournal.com 2006-10-01 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
that's absolutely obscene.

photography being accurate depiction? oh, no, we can't have that.

how about an automated "ugly filter" to remove the faces of those you deem to have come up short on looks, too?
" They say cameras add ten pounds " the advertising blurb says. so who the **** are the "they" in this shallow-minded planet of idiots who say that? quite aside from the body fascism that it promotes, that's a downright insult to every one of us who care about our photography.

and what the hell is "wrong" with the models depicted in the little video trailer advert? Neither need nor deserve a digital edit.

Grr.